The Phoenix Hypothesis

The boook can be bought here

 

 

Excerpt from book The Phoenix Hypothesis:

 

This seperation of my understanding is based on the fundamental nature of the matrix as I recognize it. For example, I refer to the little-known hermetic law of “Free Will.” In the prevalent imagination, we live in a homogeneous construct that virtually bows to majority opinion or the aforementioned critical mass of co-creators. This perspective is incomplete and does not coincide with my practical experience. Instead, it seems to be the case that collective reality (everything we see on the worldly stage: Wars, politics, terror, pandemics) is almost 100% directed and controlled by artificial intelligence within the matrix.

 

In addition, the assumption that the actual number of co- creators present inside the matrix cannot reach a critical mass —would never get the numbers. The illusion of 8 billion embodied souls is created by NPCs. These organic portals simulate a population but act like bots according to clearly defined algorithms without developing a free will or ever starting to behave outside their genetic/epigenetic programming.

 

The valid number of co-creators could be a few hundred million—perhaps less. Of these incarnates, a proportion still largely mimics the NPCs because conformism is convenient, and they still need to individuate sufficiently. One may argue that even highly individualized people continue their programming that make up their personality and are, therefore, never completely free.

 

One could also call these algorithms “ego,” but perhaps this ego-program construct also becomes more of a servant asset than an unconscious ruler with progressing individuation. In other words, the collective reality is almost 100% pre-drawn. It is therefore predestined, even if the presence of the co-creators always seems to provoke “edits,” paradoxes, and temporal adjustments in the matrix. Nevertheless, the “movie script” and, thus, the prophecies will manifest themselves in one way or another on the physical stage. Ergo: the collective destiny could be inevitable. However, the co-creator can ultimately dominate his personal reality or intelligent field.

 

“We are in two realities simultaneously—one we can change and one not. Well, we are not called, without reason, co-creators, with emphasis on “co-.” My goal is to sensitize the recipients of my message to the worst case, according to the motto: “Prepare for the worst, but manifest for the best.”
The general approach is to let go of trying to control collective destiny and stop fighting windmills. The course of events is already determined at its core. We can only accept fate and make the best of it individually by also understanding the physical process as a challenge—an endeavor that will only prevail with spiritual evolution. Our intelligent field must be stable, even in the face of apocalyptic tendencies in the collective, which we can hardly ignore if we do not meditate continuously in a cave in the Himalayas. We may continue to hope for Earth 2.0 as a parallel construct, but first, we must focus on the task ahead.
To let go of the ambition controlling the collective matrix does not mean to subdue to the System. We should organize; one can also “take to the streets.” But in the end, networking with like-minded people is the most critical aspect of it. If someone thinks he must fight the System, I won’t talk him out of it.
Everyone has their role in the big game. As an individual learning experience, the aggressive approach will also have its value, but please do not fight with the illusion that you want to change the script or the outcome of the movie plot. Otherwise, this could only lead to “disillusionment.” From the perspective of the singularity of all that is, one basically always fights with oneself. More elegant than engaging in an external conflict, however, is the fight against the inner “manipulator.” This approach helps us achieve what I mentioned in the section about “physical preparations.”
I want to give another reason why I so blatantly address the worst-case scenarios. However, I should know that the facts I presented could unsettle or even frighten some people. First, information is always neutral. Our minds generate emotions from it, such as anger, joy, or fear. Even if we defuse things and explain them pleasingly, the subconscious of my counterpart suspects that I only want to calm him down. The unknown is then internally even blown up—made more significant than it already is—simply because it is unknown.
Only when we confront our fears can we grow beyond them and ourselves. We can also prepare ourselves on all levels and be more composed and focused when things get uncomfortable. Who remains in love and confidence when everything on the outside is falling apart? I would even postulate that a fundamental purpose of this matrix is to test us under stress on how we handle such scenarios. We can only grow spiritually through the catalytic effect of an all-encompassing challenge. In any athletic discipline, we can never become better than the task or the quality of the opponent allows.”

 

Excerpt from David Icke’s book The Dream

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 kommentarer

Siste innlegg